APL Governance and Trust Barometer

May 8, 2026
APL Governance and Trust Barometer

The Governance and Trust Barometer

  • Citizen-Centered Assessment
  • Perception-based governance diagnostic grounded in lived citizen experience.
  • Governance as experienced reality, not just institutional design.
  • GTB adopts a multidimensional framework that integrates diverse governance attributes into a single, interpretable composite index.

Methodology

  • Structured questionnaire administered to a nationally representative sample.
  • Organised into 8 domains:
    • Trust in Key Public Institutions
    • Perceptions of Corruption
    • Accountability and Rule of Law
    • Government Communication
    • Citizen Voice and Representation
    • Electoral Confidence
    • Political Security
    • Civic Participation

Index Construction

  • Each construct was computed as the arithmetic mean of its standardized component variables.
  • This approach ensures:
    • Transparency
    • Ease of interpretation
    • Robustness to missing values (using available-case averaging)

Composite Barometer Index

  • The overall GTB score was calculated as the unweighted average of the eight sub-indices:

[
GTB = \frac{1}{8} (ITI + CPI + ARLI + GCI + CVRI + ECI + PSI + CPI2)
]

Interpretation Framework

Findings

Governance and Trust Barometer (GTB)

Ghana is institutionally stable but lacks strong public confidence in governance outcomes.

Governance and Trust Barometer (GTB)

Key concerns:

  • Corruption Perception
  • Civic Participation
  • Political Security

Institutional Trust Index (ITI)

Corruption Perception (CPI)

Accountability and Rule of Law (ARLI)

Governance Communication (GCI)

Citizen Voice & Representation (CVRI)

Electoral Confidence (ECI)

Political Security (PSI)

Civic Participation (CPI2)

Summary of Findings

Key Insights

The Governance Paradox

  • Strong institutions BUT weak perceived integrity.
  • Gap between form and function.
  • Institutions exist, but enforcement and fairness are questioned.

Communication Vs Voice

  • Government Communication: 44.2
  • Citizen Voice: 50.8
  • Citizens can express views, but do not feel heard.
  • This suggests a weak responsiveness and feedback loops.

Electoral Strength vs Political Caution

  • Strong elections BUT weak political security.
  • Cautious engagement beyond voting.
  • Citizens trust elections but are hesitant to engage politically due to perceived risks.

Conclusion

  • The GTB suggests Ghana is structurally stable, but perceptually fragile.
  • Trust gap is the core challenge.
  • Ghana has strong democratic foundations, but must translate them into real governance outcomes to rebuild trust.
← Back to Publications